Armenia & the South Caucasus | The Caucasian Knot » OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE/PA, PACE Preliminary Election Report

OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE/PA, PACE Preliminary Election Report

The preliminary statement of the findings and conclusions by OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE/PA and PACE is available on the OSCE/ODIHR web site. While I still reserve judgment pending a press conference to be held tomorrow by It’s Your Choice, the largest domestic observation organization in Armenia, as well as the need to present evidence of electoral violations by the opposition and others, the preliminary report concludes that there were many problems identified in the conduct of the vote which still need to be addressed by the authorities.

The 19 February presidential election in the Republic of Armenia was administered mostly in line with OSCE and Council of Europe commitments and standards. The high-State authorities made genuine efforts to address shortcomings noted in previous elections, including the legal framework, and repeatedly stated their intention to conduct democratic elections. However, further improvements and commensurate political will are required to address remaining challenges such as: the absence of a clear separation between State and party functions, the lack of public confidence in the electoral process and ensuring equal treatment of election contestants. The conduct of the count did not contribute to reducing an existing suspicion amongst election stakeholders.

The CEC ensured a high level of transparency, except in the consideration of complaints that were for the most part dealt with in informal sessions. Although consistent with the election code, this process did not allow the presence of candidate proxies, observers and media, thus undermining trust.

The full report is available in PDF format here. An Armenian version is also available.

And here’s the key issues that should now be in the center of attention for the opposition and civil society.

Good luck to them because these points really need to be addressed rather than the tiring tendency of holding only demonstrations attended by an insignificant number of people until nothing changes and eventually people give up and go home.

In my opinion, using the legal mechanisms available to them, scoring some successes while losing as well, is crucial in the development of democracy in Armenia. Of course, nobody ever said it was going to be easy, but if allegations are made, they have to be backed up by proof.

ELECTIONS ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE DAY OF VOTING”, HEAD OF OSCE LONG-TERM OBSERVATION MISSION IN ARMENIA STRESSED

Mediamax
February 20, 2008

[…]

Mediamax reports that, speaking at a news conference in Yerevan today, Geert Ahrens stressed that “the elections are not limited to the day of voting”. He stressed that the long-term observers from OSCE/ODIHR will be attentively following the investigation of the criminal cases, initiated in connection with the electoral violations, as well as the consideration of complaints, presented by the presidential candidates and their staffs.

[…]

The Head of PACE Observation Group, British MP John Prescott stated that the observers may not base on the violation statements, which do not have factual evidence and proofs. Geert Ahrens agreed: “we cannot reproduce statements, evidence of which we do not have”.

http://www.elections2008.am/Default.aspx?news_id=336

The need to present evidence is vital given concerns at the tendency for political groups in Armenia to allege anything and everything, sometimes without cause or good reason. Besides, the OSCE-ODIHR did identify cases of violence, intimidation, falsification, but to argue that there were other cases needs evidence.

Until then, unless IYC can present more information, why should anyone not believe that the following from the OSCE report is not true? That is, that the violations were less than in 2003.

On election day, the conduct of opening and voting was assessed in positive terms in a large majority of polling stations (PS) visited. Polling was conducted in a relatively calm atmosphere, although tension or unrest were noted in some 6 per cent of PSs visited, which on occasion resulted in violent incidents. Unauthorized persons were noted in over 10 per cent of PSs visited. In some 3 per cent of PSs visited, interference in the election process was noted, mostly by candidate proxies.

The secrecy of the vote was improved but further progress is required especially for military voting. Although declining, group voting remained a problem. In isolated cases, serious problems were noted, including: campaigning, attempts to influence voters’ choices, intimidation of voters, ‘controlled voting’, vote-buying, and transportation of voters from one PS to another. Formal complaints were filed in very few PSs visited.

The count was assessed as ‘bad’ or ‘very bad’ in some 16 per cent of PSs visited. Problems noted included: not announcing aloud the number of votes for each candidate, inconsistent determination of valid votes, the use of mobile phones, and the frequent failure to post results protocols publicly. In several PSs visited, IEOM observers reported deliberate falsification of data entered into the protocol.

If evidence exists that violations occurred in more polling stations, the opposition and civil society needs to prevent evidence of that to the OSCE as well as use the courts to overturn the count in those precincts. For sure, from my own experience yesterday, there were many video cameras around. Otherwise, it just one politically-partisan word against another.

Onnik 02.21.08 / 2am

Onnik 02.21.08 / 12pm

U.S. expresses concern over Armenia’s presidential vote count

WASHINGTON, Feb. 20 (Xinhua) — The United States expressed concern on Wednesday over alleged report of problems in the vote count in Armenia’s presidential election.

A report by election observers led by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) called the election “mostly in line with international standards,” according to State Department official Edgar Vazquez.

However, “We are concerned by some elements of the report, including a description of the vote-count as ‘bad’ or ‘very bad’” in 15 percent of the polling stations observed by the OSCE-led overseers, Vazquez said.

Vazquez also called on all parties in the country to remain peaceful and refrain from violence.

Vazquez made the comments after the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) of Armenia announced Wednesday that Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan won the presidential election by securing 52.86 percent of ballots in preliminary results from all 1923 polling stations.

Global Voices Online » Armenia: Disputed Election 02.21.08 / 2pm

[…] short history as an independent post-Soviet republic. However, international observers said it largely complied with international standards. time savedwww.globalvoicesonline.org Share […]

Armenia Election Monitor 2008 » Blog Archive » Ter-Petrossian Claims Military Support 02.22.08 / 1pm

[…] support former president Levon Ter-Petrossian after Tuesday’s presidential election which international and domestic observers report was conducted mainly in accordance with the law in the majority of […]

OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE/PA, PACE Preliminary Election Report

Twitter Updates

Global Voices Online: Caucasus

4 Comments

Have your say

Please Note:

About

Recently

Monthly Archives

Categories

OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE/PA, PACE Preliminary Election Report

Twitter Updates

Global Voices Online: Caucasus

4 Comments

Have your say

Please Note:

About

Blogroll

Recently

Monthly Archives

Categories